{"id":27745,"date":"2018-03-25T08:56:33","date_gmt":"2018-03-25T08:56:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/?p=27745"},"modified":"2018-03-26T16:08:50","modified_gmt":"2018-03-26T16:08:50","slug":"is-quantitative-data-enough-to-understand-your-customers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/is-quantitative-data-enough-to-understand-your-customers\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Quantitative Data Enough to Understand Your Customers?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Big data is becoming increasingly important for marketing and business success. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/louiscolumbus\/2017\/12\/24\/53-of-companies-are-adopting-big-data-analytics\/\">About 53 percent of companies<\/a> are already relying on big data-driven analytics, and that number is only set to grow.<\/p>\n<p>Most big data analytics programs rely on what\u2019s known as quantitative data; these are data points that are precisely measurable, such as a \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cno\u201d binary answer, or a number on a scale from 1 to 10 as a subjective rating. Companies are spending more time and effort gathering quantitative data because of the enormous potential it has when combined with high-tech analytics platforms, but is it really enough to understand your customer base?<\/p>\n<h2><strong>The Advantages of Quantitative Data<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>To be sure, there are some <a href=\"https:\/\/healthresearchfunding.org\/pros-cons-quantitative-research\/\">significant advantages to using quantitative data<\/a> to understand your audience:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Data volume. <\/strong>First, quantitative data allows you to gather a far greater volume of data overall. Because you can gather quantitative metrics from thousands of people at once, there\u2019s practically no limit to how much information you can pull with a single survey. More data is often better, because it helps you see a truer \u201caverage\u201d for a given population; the bigger your sample size, the more accurate your final results are going to be.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Objectivity. <\/strong>Numerical metrics are also inherently objective. Though some respondents may be rating qualitative experiences, they\u2019ll be doing it in a form that\u2019s easy to measure. There\u2019s no interpretation involved when determining your average customer\u2019s experience is a 7\/10; instead, there\u2019s a clear number that\u2019s immune from the influence of bias or distortion. This means your results tend to be more accurate and representational.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Time and cost. <\/strong>Quantitative data is also commonly favored because it\u2019s relatively inexpensive, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.snapsurveys.com\/blog\/qualitative-vs-quantitative-research\/\">doesn\u2019t take much time to gather<\/a>. Qualitative methods tend to require long hours of reviewing individual responses, which don\u2019t compile or aggregate as easily as discrete, numerical data points.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong>Where It Falls Short<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>However, quantitative data falls short in three key areas:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Engagement. <\/strong>Quantitative studies can make people feel like statistics, or cogs in a machine, but the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.slicktext.com\/blog\/2018\/02\/how-retention-marketing-plays-a-part-in-your-mass-texting-success\/\">real secret to customer retention and brand reputation<\/a> is customer engagement. Qualitative research methods help you get to know your customers on a personal level. Participants in your study will feel more seen and heard, and you\u2019ll get a chance to have a more personal connection with your target demographics.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Outliers. <\/strong>Compiling quantitative data also tends to mask the presence of outliers; sure, most of your target demographics spend $250 a month on groceries, but what about the few strange cases who spend $100, or $600 a month? Digging deeper into individual circumstances helps you grasp these uncommon deviations.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The \u201cwhy\u201d factor. <\/strong>Quantitative data also can\u2019t tell you the \u201cwhy\u201d behind your customers\u2019 qualities and answers. For example, you may learn that your customers prefer chicken to beef, but if you don\u2019t understand why this is the case, you may not be able to effectively market to them. If you think they prefer chicken to beef because of perceived health benefits, your message may fail if the reality is that they prefer chicken because of its association with a certain dish. Only qualitative data can help you form better conclusions here.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong>Generating Qualitative Data<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>One of the best ways to compensate for the disadvantages of quantitative data is to incorporate more qualitative data into your research\u2014in other words, data that can\u2019t be easily numbered or categorized. These are some of the most efficient ways to do it:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Open-ended surveys. <\/strong>Using a platform like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.surveymonkey.com\/\">Survey Monkey<\/a>, you can create a survey for your customers or target demographics that asks for more open-ended answers. For example, rather than just asking your customers to rate their overall experience from 1 to 10, you could ask them for specific comments about their experience.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Interviews. <\/strong>It\u2019s also a good idea to pull out a handful of people from your target demographics and interview them one-on-one. It\u2019s your chance to ask specific questions related to their perspectives and experiences, but also get a firsthand view on their behavioral tendencies and overall dispositions.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Representation. <\/strong>You can also hire a more diverse team of people, so you have broader perspectives on how your customers think and operate. After all, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/business-functions\/organization\/our-insights\/why-diversity-matters\">diverse companies are 35 percent more likely<\/a> to have financial returns above industry medians.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>So is quantitative data enough to truly understand your customers? Not if you want a deeper understanding of their motivations and unique perspectives. That said, it\u2019s still one of the most cost-efficient and objective tools we have for learning more about our audiences; therefore, the best approach is one that combines the sheer volume and analytic potential of quantitative research with the insights of qualitative research to back it up.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Big data is becoming increasingly important for marketing and business success. About 53 percent of companies are already relying on big data-driven analytics, and that number is only set to grow. Most big data analytics programs rely on what\u2019s known as quantitative data; these are data points that are precisely measurable, such as a \u201cyes\u201d [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":518,"featured_media":27863,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"Is Quantitative Data Enough to Understand Your Customers?","_seopress_titles_desc":"So is quantitative data enough to truly understand your customers? Not if you want a deeper understanding of their motivations and unique perspectives.","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[48,5],"tags":[252,974,2694,2695],"class_list":{"0":"post-27745","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-big-data","8":"category-data-quality","9":"tag-big-data","10":"tag-big-data-analytics","11":"tag-quantitative-data","12":"tag-understand-your-customers"},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27745"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/518"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27745"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27745\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27865,"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27745\/revisions\/27865"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.smartdatacollective.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}